agent.ops@ v3.4.1
Internal agents
SyncprodOps bots, call summarizers, lead enrichment, admin tools. The busywork your team does by hand, now a job that runs on its own.
Signature
ops: (task: Brief) → Result<Action[]>stack · Claude Agent SDK · n8n
Model
Claude Opus 4.7
Latency · p95
2.1s
Cost / call
$0.018
Eval pass
96.2%
agent.rag@ v2.7.0
RAG support chat
StreamingprodChat that answers from your knowledge base, not thin air. Every answer is grounded and cited. When it is not sure, it hands off to a person.
Signature
rag: (msg: Msg, ctx: Conv) → Stream<Reply>stack · pgvector · LangGraph
Model
Claude Sonnet 4.6 · pgvector
Latency · p95
1.4s
Cost / call
$0.014
Eval pass
94.1%
agent.voice@ v1.9.0
Voice agents
RealtimeprodInbound qualifying, outbound calls, booking. The agent talks, transcribes, and writes the result back to your CRM.
Signature
voice: (audio: Stream<PCM>) → Stream<Turn>stack · Vapi · Retell · WebRTC
Model
Haiku 4.5 · Vapi · Retell
Latency · p95
560ms
Cost / call
$0.21 / min
Eval pass
91.8%
flow.automate@ v4.1.2
Workflow automations
AsyncprodForm-to-action chains, enrichment, lead scoring, reporting. Built on n8n, self-hosted. The manual handoffs just stop.
Signature
automate: (trigger: Event) → Run<Job>stack · n8n · Make · Zapier
Model
Routed · Sonnet / Haiku
Latency · p95
320ms
Cost / call
$0.004
Eval pass
98.4%
agent.content@ v2.3.0
Content pipelines
Multi-agentprodOne pillar becomes a week of posts, locked to your tone. The agent drafts, a senior editor reviews, you ship.
Signature
content: (pillar: Brief) → Atom[12]stack · Claude · n8n
Model
Claude Opus 4.7 · Sonnet 4.6
Latency · p95
4.8s
Cost / call
$0.42 / piece
Eval pass
89.6%
agent.admin@ v1.5.4
Internal LLM tools
SyncstagingSmall web apps your ops team uses: tag records, summarize queues, batch-extract data. Grind work goes from hours to a click.
Signature
admin: (rows: Record[]) → Annotated[]stack · Next.js · Claude
Model
Haiku 4.5
Latency · p95
180ms
Cost / call
$0.0006 / row
Eval pass
95.3%
Claude Agent SDK·n8n·RAG·MCP·Voice·Evals
The agent lives in your repo. Cancel us and it keeps running.
A senior engineer turns your manual work into agents that live in your repo, with evals before live traffic, month to month.
- 01One named senior engineer signs the build
- 02Code in your repo, your infra, your keys
- 03Two QA passes before live traffic
- 04Free workflow audit in days
Send the workflow. Get the diagram.
Tell us what to automate. In days: a diagram, an eval plan, a cost estimate, and a price. Numbers, not a pitch.
A senior replies within 1 business day · 57+ active engagements
Agent diagram · sanitized snapshot
The pipeline we actually ship.
AI automation services, in plain terms: a senior engineer turns a manual process into AI agents and workflow automation that run on their own. Five nodes, each with its own latency and cost. You get this back in your audit, drawn for your workflow. Evals on every node, tracing before live traffic.
Diagram v 04 · client-11
- 01
Trigger
Form / Webhook
p95
80ms
cost
$0.001
- 02
Retrieve
pgvector / Pinecone
p95
120ms
cost
$0.0008
- 03
LLM
Claude Opus 4.7
p95
1.4s
cost
$0.012
- 04
Eval
Langfuse / Braintrust
p95
60ms
cost
$0.0003
- 05
Action
CRM / Slack / DB
p95
90ms
cost
$0.0005
Total p95
1.75s
Cost / call
$0.014
Eval pass · illustrative
94.2%
- Grounded answers, low-confidence to a humanillustrative
Support deflection bot
- Form to enriched CRM recordillustrative
Lead enricher
- Every call summarized and filedillustrative
Call summarizer
- One pillar into a week of postsillustrative
Content pipeline
This is what an audit reply looks like. Real diagram, real costs, real evals. No deck.
Send the workflowWorkflow audit · sample finding card
What we check before an agent ships.
Every engagement opens with an audit. FAIL items become sprint one. You see all of it, including what we would not touch yet.
- FAILHallucination managementNo grounding, no confidence threshold, no human fallback. Wrong answers reach the customer.
- FAILObservability and tracingNo tracing wired. You cannot see the prompt, context, or tool calls. Debugging is guesswork.
- WARNEval suiteZero evals. No way to catch quality slipping when a prompt changes.
- WARNVendor lock-inHardcoded to one provider. No abstraction layer. Switching means a rewrite.
- PASSData residency and securityVendor confirmed not to train on your inputs. PII scrubbing in place.
- PASSAPI key custodyKeys stay in your vault, rotated on a schedule. No shared keys in the code.
Findings like these land in your inbox in days, with the diagram. Every build then clears two QA passes before live traffic.
Commission the auditI·Who does the actual build
One owner
named senior engineer
II·Where the code and prompts live
Your repo
your infra, your keys
III·When you can inspect every call
Day 01
evals + tracing
IV·When the audit lands
In days
brief to diagram
Retainer or one-off build · Token cost passes through at provider cost
agents.registry · what we build
The AI agents and workflow automation we build. Each shipped to a repo you own.
06 / 06 · code in your repo
The stack is yours to inspect, swap, or fork. Every choice is one a senior with about a decade can defend, with the evals to back it. One of 8 practices. Hire it alone or add more, never a forced bundle.
Send the workflowWhen the call usually comes in
Three reasons the workflow lands in our inbox.
- Reason 01
You have ops work that should be a script.
Call summaries, lead enrichment, classification, all done by hand. You do not need a full-time AI hire. Bring in our bench, and a production agent ships in the first sprint.
- Reason 02
Your Zapier flow keeps breaking.
Twelve steps, three branches, an LLM call jammed in the middle, no error handling. We rebuild that business process automation on n8n with evals, retries, and tracing. The code lives in your repo.
- Reason 03
You are done paying consultants for slides.
Months of meetings, a deck, and not one agent live. You get the opposite: a free audit in days, a prototype in your repo soon after, evals before live traffic.
The honest comparison
When senior-led AI fits. And when it doesn't.
- Senior AI engineer named on your workyesnodependsyes
- Evals and tracing on day onedependsnorareyes
- Code in your repo, your infrayesnodependsyes
- Token cost passes straight to youn/anorareyes
- Human fallback wired independsnodependsyes
- Mutual NDA and no-train clausen/anodependsyes
- You own everything if you leaveyesnodependsyes
- You can cancel month to monthnodependsdependsyes
Four principles.
Wired into every agent.
Most AI projects fail for the same few reasons. These four put them on the table, in writing, before an agent goes live.
- PI
You own the prompts, the code, and the infra
Prompts and code live in your repo, version-controlled. Infra runs on your accounts. Token costs pass through at provider cost. We never hold your API keys.
Principle I - PII
Evals and tracing on day one
Tracing is wired before the first live call. Every prompt change runs the evals before it ships. You see what the agent did, why, and what it cost. No black box.
Principle II - PIII
Low-confidence answers go to a human, not a guess
A confidence threshold sits on every output. Below it, the answer routes to a person, not the customer. Every claimed fact shows its source.
Principle III - PIV
Mutual NDA, and no training on your data
Signed before we look at your workflows. 0 NDA incidents to date. Vendor contracts confirmed not to train on your inputs. PII scrubbing in place.
Principle IV
Operator's mark
You can cancel any month, month to month. Most clients stay: 19 months is the average tenure here.
Eval ledger · sample build · v0.1 → v1.0
Every version runs the evals. None ships without them.
Production gate · ≥ 90% pass
- v0.1Day 03
Baseline. Zero-shot Sonnet, no retrieval, no HITL.
84 tests · Senior engineer
p951.9sCost$0.01846.2% - v0.2Day 07
pgvector retrieval over your KB. Confidence threshold at 0.72.
124 tests · Senior engineer
p951.7sCost$0.01462.8%▲ 16.6 - v0.3Day 12
System prompt rewrite. Voice locked to your brand doc.
188 tests · Senior engineer
p951.6sCost$0.01471.4%▲ 8.6 - v0.4Day 18
Human fallback below 0.65 confidence. Citations surfaced.
246 tests · Senior engineer
p951.5sCost$0.01382.0%▲ 10.6 - v0.5Day 22
Router added. Haiku for tier-2, Opus for tier-1. Cost halved.
312 tests · Senior engineer
p951.4sCost$0.00987.6%▲ 5.6 - v1.0shippedDay 28
Evals past the production gate. Rolled out to 100% traffic.
312 tests · Account lead
p951.4sCost$0.00994.2%▲ 6.6
The first agent reaches production in weeks. The diagram and audit land in days.
Start the auditWhat people ask before they let an agent into the stack.
Plain answers on who owns the prompts, how we keep the agent honest, and what it costs.
Zapier is fine for two-tool, low-stakes glue. The moment your workflow needs branching, retries, audit logs, or an LLM call inside a step, it gets fragile fast. We build the layer underneath: real code, with tracing you can read, and we only reach for a model when classification or generation is the actual job. The result lives in your repo, so your team can take it over whenever you want.
Zapier is great for two-tool, low-stakes glue. The moment a workflow needs branching logic, retry handling, audit logs, or LLM calls inside a step, you hit the wall fast. We build the next layer down — custom code with proper observability — and only reach for an LLM when classification or generation is the actual job.
Whichever fits the task, and we tell you which one and why in the audit. The choice stays swappable behind an abstraction layer, so you are never locked to one provider. Your API keys stay in your environment. We never hold them.
Whichever fits the task. Claude for reasoning and code-adjacent work, GPT-4 for general agents, Gemini for cost-sensitive classification, locally hosted Llama for privacy-sensitive enterprise jobs. We tell you which model and why in the scoping doc, and we keep the choice swappable.
They keep working. The code is in your repo, on your infra, with the runbook and dashboards. A monthly retainer is optional. It covers alerts, edge-case fixes, and model swaps as providers update. You are month to month, so you can keep it for a sprint or two and then move ops in-house. No lock-in.
They work. Every build ships with a runbook, monitoring dashboards, and an on-call escalation path. A monthly operating retainer is optional — it covers alerts, edge-case fixes, and model swaps as the providers update. Many teams take it for the first six months and then move ops in-house.
In your infrastructure: your Postgres, your Supabase, your VPC, your bucket. We never run a shared, multi-tenant database with your data in it. The mutual NDA is signed before we look at anything, vendor contracts are confirmed not to train on your inputs, and everything we build is yours to take on day one.
In your infrastructure. Postgres, Supabase, your VPC, your S3 bucket. We never run a multi-tenant database. API keys for the models stay in your environment variables. Everything we build is fully transferable on day one.
Both. Internal LLM tools and custom CRMs are a regular build: admin pages, role-based access, audit logs, with the automations layered on top. Built around how your team actually works, not bent out of a tool you have to adapt to. Two QA passes before anything ships.
Yes. Custom CRMs are a regular engagement — same stack as the automations, with admin pages, role-based access, audit logs, and the workflow automations layered on top. Designed around your team's actual workflow, not adapted from Salesforce.
Three ways, wired before any live traffic. Retrieval grounds answers in your own knowledge base instead of guessing. A confidence threshold sends low-confidence answers to a person, not to your customer. And an eval suite runs on every prompt change to catch quality slipping before it ships. Where the agent claims a fact, it shows the source.
Every flow has a retry policy, a fallback path, and a Slack alert when both fail. The run log records every invocation with its status and duration. Edge cases that surface in production get added to the test suite. Nothing fails silently.
Still have a question? Ask it in the brief. A senior replies within 1 business day.
What happens after you send
A senior replies first. No SDR in between.
You send one workflow. The engineer who would build it replies within 1 business day, signs the mutual NDA, then the diagram and audit land. Here is what runs in between.
- 01Within 1 business day
A senior replies
Not a coordinator, not an SDR. The engineer who would run your workflow replies, confirms scope, and sends the mutual NDA.
- 02Next, the audit
We run the workflow audit
Once the NDA is signed: hallucination management, tracing, evals, lock-in, data residency, key custody. You see every finding.
- 03Then the diagram
Diagram and price land
The diagram, the audit, an eval plan, a cost estimate, the named engineer, and a price. Retainer or one-off, your call.
No follow-up sequence. No drip campaign. You hear from a senior, not a sales rep.
Start step 01One step
Send the workflow.
We'll send back a diagram.
In days: a diagram, an audit, an eval plan, a cost estimate, the named engineer, and a price. Retainer or one-off, your call.
- 01Free diagram and audit in days
- 02A senior engineer named on day one
- 03Code in your repo, evals before live traffic
- 04Token cost passes straight to you
Rather talk first?
Book a 20-minute call with a seniorSend the workflow. Diagram comes back fast.
A few fields. One business day to a senior reply. No follow-up sequence.
Sealed · Read by a senior engineer
Free workflow audit · back in days
Production AI agents, not slides